Deviniti
Atlassian-focused consulting with custom AI application development
Founded 2004 | Wrocław, Poland | 201-250 employees | Last updated: August 2026
workflow-integrationenterprise-automationtask-automation
What is Deviniti?
Deviniti was founded on December 13, 2004 in Wrocław, Poland by Piotr Jan Dorosz and Jacek Michał Machata, and now has 250+ employees. The company combines Atlassian-focused consulting and marketplace apps with custom software development, cloud/DevOps, and AI application services.
Deviniti was founded in 2004 and is headquartered in Wrocław, Poland. The firm employs 201-250 people and works primarily with clients in SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Atlassian marketplace-app pedigree gives it unusually deep workflow-tool integration experience.
Deviniti tech stack and services
AWSAzurePython
| Service area | Details |
|---|---|
| Atlassian-integrated workflow agents | Available for SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech clients |
| Custom AI application development | Available for SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech clients |
| Cloud/DevOps automation | Available for SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech clients |
Deviniti use cases
Short answer: Deviniti is best suited for teams already on Atlassian tooling wanting AI agents integrated into that ecosystem.
| Use case | Industries | Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Atlassian-integrated workflow agents | SaaS, Manufacturing | AWS, Azure |
| Custom AI application development | SaaS, Manufacturing | AWS, Azure |
| Cloud/DevOps automation | SaaS, Manufacturing | AWS, Azure |
Deviniti pricing
Short answer: Deviniti uses a fixed project, dedicated team pricing approach. Minimum engagement starts at $15K.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed project | From $15K | Well-defined scope |
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Staff augmentation | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Deviniti does not publish a public rate card. Contact them directly via their website to get project-specific pricing.
Deviniti pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +20+ years of operating history with a clear founding date and leadership | -Atlassian-ecosystem specialization is a narrower fit for buyers outside that toolchain |
| +Deep Atlassian ecosystem expertise supports agent integration into existing workflow tools | -AI application work is a newer addition relative to its two-decade core consulting history |
| +Combines marketplace product development with custom consulting delivery |
Deviniti vs alternatives
How Deviniti compares to the other top AI Agent developers.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turing | Engineering-heavy teams needing elite technical talent for reasoning-heavy... | Deep AGI-infrastructure focus (reasoning, coding, complex problem-solving) backed by a very large vetted engineering bench | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Spiral Scout | CTOs who want to evaluate a vendor's own... | Built and maintains its own agent orchestration runtime (Wippy.ai), plus certified Temporal Solution Provider status | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | Teams that need a senior, agent-specialist team without... | 100% of delivery staff are senior AI engineers — no junior bench, no agent-to-generalist handoff | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Vstorm | Mid-market and enterprise buyers wanting a boutique team... | Verified enterprise client roster (Mercedes-Benz, Intel) despite a small team size | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Large enterprises needing public-company scale, compliance rigor, and... | Publicly traded (Nasdaq: GDYN) with 4,500+ engineers — unmatched scale and financial transparency in this roster | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | Enterprises wanting a three-decade engineering firm with deep... | 30+ years of engineering discipline applied to a documented spec-driven approach for agentic workflows | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises needing large-scale, multi-year AI agent engineering programs... | 2,400+ engineers with 20+ years of engineering track record predating its agentic AI practice | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Waverley Software | Technical buyers in FinTech, Healthcare, or Robotics wanting... | 30+ years of engineering history explicitly repositioned as AI-first, with deep vertical domain experience (Robotics, Energy, FinTech) | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Andersen | Enterprises wanting a single vendor with true multi-vertical... | 3,500+ engineers with named vertical specialization across 7+ industries, not a single-domain shop | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Ascendion | Global 2000 buyers wanting an AI-native engineering firm... | Built from inception (2022) around AI-powered engineering rather than retrofitting AI onto a legacy delivery model | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| GeekyAnts | Product teams wanting AI-agent features embedded into a... | 18+ years of product engineering combined with an active internal AI-agent R&D program (Geekathon) | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Innowise | Buyers wanting large-scale offshore delivery capacity with an... | 3,500+ person full-cycle software firm with a dedicated internal AI Hub, not a small AI-only shop | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Ideas2IT | Engineering-heavy buyers interested in AI-augmented software delivery, not... | Proprietary Agentic SDLC Studio applying agents to its own software delivery process, not just client-facing products | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Trantor | Enterprises wanting a dedicated, captive engineering center rather... | CaptiveCoE™ model gives clients a dedicated center of excellence rather than a shared delivery pool | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Netguru | Digital product companies wanting a proven internal-agent case... | Publicly documented internal production agent (Omega) as proof of applied agent-building capability | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Kanerika | Data-heavy enterprises wanting agents tied directly into existing... | Named, production-deployed internal agent suite (Karl, DokGPT, and others) beyond generic client demos | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Quytech | Buyers wanting agentic AI paired with computer vision... | Broader AI portfolio spanning agentic AI, computer vision, and AR/VR beyond agents alone | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Matellio | Enterprises wanting AI agents built alongside a larger... | US-HQ enterprise software firm with true multi-country delivery (UK, France, Germany) beyond a single offshore hub | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Sombra | Buyers wanting a mid-size dedicated-team partner with a... | Founder-led (Viktor Chekh) firm with over a decade of full-cycle engineering ahead of its AI/ML expansion | 3.7 | Full comparison |
| Intuz | Buyers wanting a documented count of live production... | Reports 100+ enterprise agent deployments already in production across three named framework stacks | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Azilen Technologies | FinTech, HRTech, and manufacturing buyers wanting vertical-specific AI... | Explicit vertical focus across FinTech, manufacturing, and HRTech rather than horizontal generalism | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Instinctools | Enterprises wanting a long-tenured European engineering partner for... | 25 years of continuous engineering delivery under the same founding leadership, spanning Germany and the US | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| Miquido | Product-focused technical teams wanting an analyst-recognized AI engineering... | Independently recognized by Clutch as a Global Leader in Artificial Intelligence, not just self-marketed | 3.6 | Full comparison |
| EffectiveSoft | Buyers wanting established Eastern European engineering depth under... | 25 years of software delivery history with dedicated Eastern European development centers | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Azumo | Buyers wanting nearshore delivery cost savings without giving... | Primarily referral-driven client base including named enterprise brands (Meta, UnitedHealth) | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| DevSquad | Early-to-growth-stage product teams wanting agent development paired with... | Combines product-market-fit strategy work with AI agent development, useful for teams still validating their product | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| Cogniteq | EU-based buyers wanting a Baltic-region engineering partner with... | 20 years of full-cycle software delivery based in the EU (Lithuania), useful for EU data-residency needs | 3.5 | Full comparison |
| DevCom | Buyers wanting a single US-HQ vendor to own... | Full lifecycle ownership (strategy through production support) under one US-headquartered vendor | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Softermii | Startups wanting a US-facing account team backed by... | Dedicated Kyiv R&D center paired with US-based (LA/Vegas) client-facing presence | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Codebridge Technology | Cost-sensitive buyers wanting a Delaware-incorporated vendor with Ukrainian... | US legal incorporation (Delaware) paired with Kyiv-based engineering delivery for contracting simplicity | 3.4 | Full comparison |
| Uvik Software | Startups needing one or two senior Python/AI engineers... | Narrow staff-augmentation model of individual senior Python/AI/ML specialists at low minimum spend | 3.3 | Full comparison |
| Riseup Labs | Highly cost-sensitive buyers who need ISO-certified process rigor... | ISO 9001 and 27001 certification brings documented process/security rigor at a low-cost delivery base | 3.3 | Full comparison |
Deviniti FAQ
What is Deviniti?
Deviniti was founded on December 13, 2004 in Wrocław, Poland by Piotr Jan Dorosz and Jacek Michał Machata, and now has 250+ employees. The company combines Atlassian-focused consulting and marketplace apps with custom software development, cloud/DevOps, and AI application services.
How much does Deviniti charge?
Deviniti uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing. Minimum engagement starts at $15K. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Deviniti use?
Deviniti works with AWS, Azure, Python. Primary industries served include SaaS, Manufacturing, Fintech.
Is Deviniti right for enterprise?
Teams already on Atlassian tooling wanting AI agents integrated into that ecosystem. 201-250 team size. Key consideration: Atlassian-ecosystem specialization is a narrower fit for buyers outside that toolchain.
What are the best Deviniti alternatives?
The best alternatives to Deviniti depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Turing: deep agi-infrastructure focus (reasoning, coding, complex problem-solving) backed by a very large vetted engineering bench
- Spiral Scout: built and maintains its own agent orchestration runtime (wippy.ai), plus certified temporal solution provider status
- Tensorway: 100% of delivery staff are senior ai engineers — no junior bench, no agent-to-generalist handoff
Compare Deviniti with other AI Agent developers
Deviniti vs Turing Deviniti vs Spiral Scout Deviniti vs Tensorway Deviniti vs Vstorm Deviniti vs Grid Dynamics Deviniti vs SoftServe Deviniti vs N-iX Deviniti vs Waverley Software Deviniti vs Andersen Deviniti vs Ascendion Deviniti vs GeekyAnts Deviniti vs Innowise Deviniti vs Ideas2IT Deviniti vs Trantor Deviniti vs Netguru Deviniti vs Kanerika Deviniti vs Quytech Deviniti vs Matellio Deviniti vs Sombra Deviniti vs Intuz Deviniti vs Azilen Technologies Deviniti vs Instinctools Deviniti vs Miquido Deviniti vs EffectiveSoft Deviniti vs Azumo Deviniti vs DevSquad Deviniti vs Cogniteq Deviniti vs DevCom Deviniti vs Softermii Deviniti vs Codebridge Technology Deviniti vs Uvik Software Deviniti vs Riseup Labs
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with Deviniti before making a decision.